Factors determining accumulation of bisphenol A and alkylphenols at a low trophic level as exemplified by mussels Mytilus trossulus
Marta Staniszewska , Bożena Graca , Adam Sokołowski , Iga Nehring , Andrzej Wasik , Anna Jendzul
AbstractThe aim of the study was to investigate abiotic and biotic factors influencing the accumulation of endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) such as bisphenol A (BPA), 4-tert-octylphenol (OP) and 4-nonylphenol (NP) in mussels Mytilus trossulus from the Gulf of Gdansk (Southern Baltic). The key abiotic factor influencing BPA, OP and NP accumulation in mussels is their hydrophilicity/lipophilicity, which affects their main assimilation routes - by digestive tract for the more lipophilic OP and NP, and additionally by the gills for the less lipophilic BPA. As a result, high condition index (i.e. higher soft tissue weight) is more often correlated with high concentrations of OP and NP in mussels than with BPA. Furthermore, alkylphenols have 6–8 times greater accumulative potential than BPA. Concentration of the studied compounds was lower in females than in males following spawning, and the effect lasted longer for BPA than for alkylphenols. The influence of season and hydrological conditions on BPA, OP, NP in the mussel was more pronounced than the proximity of external sources of these compounds. An increase in water temperature in summer probably stimulated the solubility of BPA, the least lipophilic of the studied compounds, and led to increased assimilation of this compound from water (through gills). On the other hand, high OP and NP concentrations in mussels occurred in spring, which was caused by increased surface run-off and sediments resuspension.
|Other language title versions|
|Journal series||Environmental Pollution, ISSN 0269-7491, (A 40 pkt)|
|Publication size in sheets||0.6|
|Keywords in English||bisphenol A, alkylphenols, Mytilus trossulus, accumulation, trophic level, endocrine disruptors|
|ASJC Classification||; ; ;|
|Score||= 40.0, 24-07-2019, ArticleFromJournal|
|Publication indicators||= 5; : 2016 = 1.729; : 2017 = 4.358 (2) - 2017=5.291 (5)|
* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.