Narration in judiciary fact-finding: a probabilistic explication

Rafał Urbaniak

Abstract

Legal probabilism is the view that juridical fact-finding should be mod-eled using Bayesian methods. One of the alternatives to it is the narration view,according to which instead we should conceptualize the process in terms of com-peting narrations of what (allegedly) happened. The goal of this paper is to developa reconciliatory account, on which the narration view is construed from the Baye-sian perspective within the framework of formal Bayesian epistemology.
Author Rafał Urbaniak (FSS / IPSJ / DLPSE)
Rafał Urbaniak,,
- Division of Logic, Philosophy of Science and Epistemology
Journal seriesArtificial Intelligence and Law, ISSN 0924-8463, e-ISSN 1572-8382, (0 pkt)
Issue year2018
Vol26
No4
Pages345-376
Publication size in sheets1.55
Keywords in Englishlegal probabilism, formal epistemology, probability, narration
ASJC Classification3308 Law; 1702 Artificial Intelligence
DOIDOI:10.1007/s10506-018-9219-z
URL https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2Fs10506-018-9219-z.pdf
Languageen angielski
LicenseJournal (articles only); published final; Uznanie Autorstwa (CC-BY); with publication
Score (nominal)5
ScoreMinisterial score = 0.0, 15-04-2019, ArticleFromJournal
Ministerial score (2013-2016) = 5.0, 15-04-2019, ArticleFromJournal - czasopismo zagraniczne spoza list
Publication indicators WoS Citations = 0; Scopus SNIP (Source Normalised Impact per Paper): 2016 = 1.484
Citation count*
Additional fields
UwagiBrak objętości od autora
Cite
Share Share

Get link to the record


* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Back