Narration in judiciary fact-finding: a probabilistic explication
AbstractLegal probabilism is the view that juridical fact-finding should be mod-eled using Bayesian methods. One of the alternatives to it is the narration view,according to which instead we should conceptualize the process in terms of com-peting narrations of what (allegedly) happened. The goal of this paper is to developa reconciliatory account, on which the narration view is construed from the Baye-sian perspective within the framework of formal Bayesian epistemology.
|Journal series||Artificial Intelligence and Law, ISSN 0924-8463, e-ISSN 1572-8382, (0 pkt)|
|Publication size in sheets||1.55|
|Keywords in English||legal probabilism, formal epistemology, probability, narration|
|License||Journal (articles only); published final; ; with publication|
|Score||= 15.0, 30-09-2019, ArticleFromJournal|
|Publication indicators||= 0; : 2016 = 1.484|
|Uwagi||Brak objętości od autora|
* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.