Mitigating anticipated effects of systematic errors supports sister-group relationship between Xenacoelomorpha and Ambulacraria

Hervé Philippe , Albert J. Poustka , Marta Chiodin , Katharina J. Hoff , Christophe Dessimoz , Bartłomiej Tomiczek , Philipp H. Schiffer , Steven Müller , Daryl Domman , Matthias Horn , Heiner Kuhl , Bernd Timmermann , Noriyuki Satoh , Tomoe Hikosaka-Katayama , Hiroaki Nakano , Matthew L. Rowe , Maurice R. Elphick , Morgane Thomas-Chollier , Thomas Hankeln , Florian Mertes , Andreas Wallberg , Jonathan P. Rast , Richard R. Copley , Pedro Martinez , Maximilian J. Telford

Abstract

Xenoturbella and the acoelomorph worms (Xenacoelomorpha) are simple marine animals with controversial affinities. They have been placed as the sister group of all other bilaterian animals (Nephrozoa hypothesis), implying their simplicity is an ancient characteristic [1, 2]; alternatively, they have been linked to the complex Ambulacraria (echinoderms and hemichordates) in a clade called the Xenambulacraria [3, 4, 5], suggesting their simplicity evolved by reduction from a complex ancestor. The difficulty resolving this problem implies the phylogenetic signal supporting the correct solution is weak and affected by inadequate modeling, creating a misleading non-phylogenetic signal. The idea that the Nephrozoa hypothesis might be an artifact is prompted by the faster molecular evolutionary rate observed within the Acoelomorpha. Unequal rates of evolution are known to result in the systematic artifact of long branch attraction, which would be predicted to result in an attraction between long-branch acoelomorphs and the outgroup, pulling them toward the root [6]. Other biases inadequately accommodated by the models used can also have strong effects, exacerbated in the context of short internal branches and long terminal branches [7]. We have assembled a large and informative dataset to address this problem. Analyses designed to reduce or to emphasize misleading signals show the Nephrozoa hypothesis is supported under conditions expected to exacerbate errors, and the Xenambulacraria hypothesis is preferred in conditions designed to reduce errors. Our reanalyses of two other recently published datasets [1, 2] produce the same result. We conclude that the Xenacoelomorpha are simplified relatives of the Ambulacraria.
Author Hervé Philippe
Hervé Philippe,,
-
, Albert J. Poustka
Albert J. Poustka,,
-
, Marta Chiodin
Marta Chiodin,,
-
, Katharina J. Hoff
Katharina J. Hoff,,
-
, Christophe Dessimoz
Christophe Dessimoz,,
-
, Bartłomiej Tomiczek (IFB/IB/DMCB)
Bartłomiej Tomiczek,,
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology
, Philipp H. Schiffer
Philipp H. Schiffer,,
-
, Steven Müller
Steven Müller,,
-
, Daryl Domman
Daryl Domman,,
-
, Matthias Horn
Matthias Horn,,
-
et al.`
Journal seriesCurrent Biology, ISSN 0960-9822, (N/A 200 pkt)
Issue year2019
Vol29
No11
Pages1818-1826
Publication size in sheets0.50
Keywords in EnglishXenoturbella, Acoelomorpha, Ambulacraria, Nephrozoa, phylogenomics, systematic error, phylogeny, Metazoa
ASJC Classification1100 General Agricultural and Biological Sciences; 1300 General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
DOIDOI:10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.009
URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.009
Languageen angielski
Score (nominal)200
Score sourcejournalList
ScoreMinisterial score = 200.0, 28-01-2020, ArticleFromJournal
Publication indicators Scopus SNIP (Source Normalised Impact per Paper): 2018 = 2.135; WoS Impact Factor: 2018 = 9.193 (2) - 2018=10.090 (5)
Citation count*
Cite
busy
Share Share

Get link to the record


* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Back
Confirmation
Are you sure?