The status quo, imponderables of change, and evaluation: between higher education policy and academic discourse

Dominik Chomik , Helena Ostrowicka


In this article, we discuss various issues regarding the contemporary reform of science and higher education in Poland, which are constructed and sustained by academics in media discourse. In the performed analyses we refer to the critical and post-Foucauldian studies on the discursive aspects of change in higher education. We propose that the connections between discursive factors, events and social changes be crystallized in the processes of their media problematization. In the space of public discourse and in the forms of the problematization of the reform of higher education, we sought the knowledge, concepts and classification rules that set the discursive framework of the change experienced by the academic community. The research has shown that this framework goes beyond the polarization of positions, that is, beyond the criticism or affirmation of neoliberal reforms. On the basis of the performed analyses we reconstructed three types of internally diversified and non-dichotomic discourses: the status quo discourse, the discourse of the imponderables of change, and the discourse of reform evaluation. Taking Poland as a case study, the article includes a discourse analysis formed at the national level in respect of the key objectives laid down at the European level.
Author Dominik Chomik (FSS / IPSJ / DMTHL)
Dominik Chomik,,
- Division of Media Theory, History and Language
, Helena Ostrowicka
Helena Ostrowicka,,
Journal seriesForum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research (FQS), ISSN 1438-5627, (N/A 70 pkt)
Issue year2019
Publication size in sheets2
Keywords in Englishhigher education reform, discourse analysis, post-Foucauldian analysis, academic discourse, problematization, media discourse, Poland
ASJC Classification3300 General Social Sciences
Languageen angielski
LicenseJournal (articles only); published final; Uznanie Autorstwa (CC-BY); with publication
Score (nominal)70
Score sourcejournalList
ScoreMinisterial score = 70.0, 18-11-2019, ArticleFromJournal
Publication indicators Scopus SNIP (Source Normalised Impact per Paper): 2018 = 1.095
Citation count*
Share Share

Get link to the record

* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Are you sure?