O konieczności poszerzenia zakresu kontroli zażaleniowej nad niektórymi decyzjami dotyczącymi praw oskarżonego - wybrane problemy implementacji unijnych dyrektyw w polskim procesie karnym

Maciej Fingas


The Treaty of Lisbon from 13.12.2007, opened up new directions and methods for the harmonization of criminal procedures in EU Member States, implemented by using directives of the European Parliament and of the Council. The article analyses the nature of obligations imposed on the Member States in directives 2010/64/EU, 2012/13/EU, 2013/48/EU, 2016/343/EU, 2016/800 and 2016/1919, especially the meaning of the term “adequate and effective remedy”. Given the obligation to incorporate the directives in national legal systems, it is important to mention that some provisions of the Polish Code of Criminal Procedure do not provide for the minimum standards laid down in the directives and therefore require legislative intervention by extending complaint control over certain decisions concerning the rights of the accused. In particular, this includes issues relating to the right of the accused to translation and interpretation, access to the case file, restrictions on contact with counsel and lack of counsel during the first hearing.
Author Maciej Fingas (FLA / DCPC)
Maciej Fingas,,
- Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics
Other language title versionsAbout the need to extend the scope of interlocutory appeal control over certain decisions regarding the rights of the accused - selected problems concerning the implementation of EU directives in Polish criminal trials
Journal seriesBiałostockie Studia Prawnicze, ISSN 1689-7404, (B 8 pkt)
Issue year2018
Publication size in sheets0.75
Keywords in Polishpostępowanie karne, dyrektywy unijne, prawa oskarżonego, środki naprawcze, postępowanie odwoławcze
Keywords in Englishcriminal proceedings, EU directives, rights of the accused, remedies, appeal proceedings
URL http://hdl.handle.net/11320/6986
Languagepl polski
LicenseRepository; published final; Other open licence; with publication
Score (nominal)8
Score sourcejournalList
ScoreMinisterial score = 8.0, 13-02-2020, ArticleFromJournal
Citation count*
Share Share

Get link to the record

* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Are you sure?