Stanowisko epistemologiczne Alvina Plantingi w sporze o naturę, funkcję i wartość uprawnienia epistemicznego
Marek Pepliński , Dariusz Łukasiewicz
AbstractThis article presents Alvin Plantinga’s views on epistemic justification. The first part situates Plantinga’s epistemological views in the context of his epistemology of religion and debates of general epistemology. The second part discusses Plantinga’s argument that the internalism of 20th century epistemology stems from deontologism and that the views on the epistemic justification of analytic philosophers reflect the relationship between classical deontologism and classical internalism. The last part points to the objections with which the Plantinga’s conception met and tries to balance the depth and weakness of its position.
|Other language title versions||Alvin Plantinga‘s position in epistemological debate about the nature, function and the value of the epistemic warrant|
|Journal series||Filo-Sofija, ISSN 1642-3267, (B 7 pkt)|
|Publication size in sheets||0.6|
|Keywords in English||Alvin Plantinga, John Locke, classical deontologism, deontologism, internalism, classical internalism, justification, warrant, theory of knowledge|
|License||Journal (articles only); published final; ; with publication|
|Score||= 7.0, 28-01-2020, ArticleFromJournal|
* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.