Stanowisko epistemologiczne Alvina Plantingi w sporze o naturę, funkcję i wartość uprawnienia epistemicznego

Marek Pepliński , Dariusz Łukasiewicz


This article presents Alvin Plantinga’s views on epistemic justification. The first part situates Plantinga’s epistemological views in the context of his epistemology of religion and debates of general epistemology. The second part discusses Plantinga’s argument that the internalism of 20th century epistemology stems from deontologism and that the views on the epistemic justification of analytic philosophers reflect the relationship between classical deontologism and classical internalism. The last part points to the objections with which the Plantinga’s conception met and tries to balance the depth and weakness of its position.
Author Marek Pepliński (FSS / IPSJ / DMPRMP)
Marek Pepliński,,
- Division of Metaphysics, Philosophy of Religion and Modern Philosophy
, Dariusz Łukasiewicz
Dariusz Łukasiewicz,,
Other language title versionsAlvin Plantinga‘s position in epistemological debate about the nature, function and the value of the epistemic warrant
Journal seriesFilo-Sofija, ISSN 1642-3267, (B 7 pkt)
Issue year2018
Publication size in sheets0.6
Keywords in EnglishAlvin Plantinga, John Locke, classical deontologism, deontologism, internalism, classical internalism, justification, warrant, theory of knowledge
Languagepl polski
LicenseJournal (articles only); published final; Other open licence; with publication
Score (nominal)7
Score sourcejournalList
ScoreMinisterial score = 7.0, 28-01-2020, ArticleFromJournal
Citation count*
Share Share

Get link to the record

* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Are you sure?