Personal and collective trans-mythologies: creative attitudes to gender incongruence among transgender individuals
Anna Kłonkowska , Stephanie Bonvissuto
AbstractEmbedded within the biographies of some transgender people are narratives elements more frequently found in culturally-specific legends settings and the interplay of mythological figures. Individuals who specifically identify as transsexuals (unlike other, non-binary or gender-queer transgender people) sometimes report the wish, the dream, and/or the desire to understand or alleviate their experienced gender incongruence in a surprisingly creative way: through some type of magical transformation. Calling upon recently collected interviews, this study examines those narratives and their use of such elements, noting their reliance on binary gender formations. Through philosophical and cultural-anthropological analyses, we suggest that these fields grant powerful and imaginative personal allowances, opportunities and perceptions to transsexual identifying trans-gender individuals – magical transformations and justified transpositions to alleviate dysphoria, a surrender of personal responsibility to unseen universal forces, and especially an inherent wisdom gifted during transitional liminality – that neither scientific nor academic evaluations of gender transition can. While these creative allowances are fictive, fantastical, and temporary, they neverthe- less articulate a need if not an imperative for understanding, expression and ultimately action on behalf of the transitioning individual.
|Journal series||Creativity Studies, ISSN 2345-0479, e-ISSN 2345-0487, (N/A 100 pkt)|
|Publication size in sheets||0.65|
|Keywords in English||creative attitude, gender incongruence, magical transformation, rite of passage, trans-gender individuals, transsexual individuals, “wrong-body” discourse|
|ASJC Classification||; ;|
|License||Journal (articles only); published final; ; with publication|
|Score||= 100.0, 30-09-2019, ArticleFromJournal|
|Publication indicators||: 2016 = 0.686|
* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.