Target species selection criteria for risk assessment based exemptions of ballast water management requirements

Stephan Gollasch , Matej David , Katja Broeg , Susanne Heitmüller , Miina Karjalainen , Maiju Lehtiniemi , Monika Normant-Saremba , Henn Ojaveer , Sergej Olenin , Marta Ruiz , Markus Helavuori , Manuel Sala-Pérez , Solvita Strake

Abstract

The Ballast Water Management Convention adopted at the International Maritime Organization (IMO) allows exemptions from ballast water management requirements. These exemptions may be granted when a risk assessment results in an acceptable low risk scenario. IMO has adopted a guideline describing different risk assessment approaches (G7 Guidelines, 2017). One approach is a species-specific risk assessment in which so called target species (TS) become important. TS are species that meet specific criteria indicating that they may impair or damage the environment, human health, property or resources and they are defined for a specific port, State or biogeographic region. The guidelines continue to describe general TS selection criteria, which include the species relationship with ballast water as a transport vector, their impact type and severeness, evidence of prior introduction(s), and its current distribution. However, the G7 Guidelines lack details how these criteria are to be defined. This paper presents the TS selection criteria developed during the EU-Interreg Baltic Sea Region COMPLETE project (Completing Management Options in the Baltic Sea Region to Reduce Risk of Invasive Species Introduction by Shipping), including explanations on what ballast water relationship means, which impact threshold is eligible to identify a TS, as well as why prior introductions and the current species distribution are relevant in that context. It was concluded that TS lists need to be regularly reviewed and that the described TS selection criteria may be also adopted elsewhere when planning species-specific risk assessments for exemptions from ballast water management requirements.
Author Stephan Gollasch - [GoConsult]
Stephan Gollasch,,
-
-
, Matej David - [Dr. Matej David Consult]
Matej David,,
-
-
, Katja Broeg - [Bundesamt für Seeschiffahrt und Hydrographie]
Katja Broeg,,
-
-
, Susanne Heitmüller - [Bundesamt für Seeschiffahrt und Hydrographie]
Susanne Heitmüller,,
-
-
, Miina Karjalainen - [Kotka Maritime Research Association]
Miina Karjalainen,,
-
-
, Maiju Lehtiniemi - [Finnish Environment Institute]
Maiju Lehtiniemi,,
-
-
, Monika Normant-Saremba (FOG/IO/DEEMO)
Monika Normant-Saremba,,
- Division of Experimental Ecology of Marine Organisms
, Henn Ojaveer - [University of Tartu]
Henn Ojaveer,,
-
-
, Sergej Olenin - [Klaipeda University]
Sergej Olenin,,
-
-
, Marta Ruiz - [Helsinki Commission]
Marta Ruiz,,
-
-
et al.`
Journal seriesOcean & Coastal Management, [Ocean and Coastal Management], ISSN 0964-5691, e-ISSN 1873-524X, (N/A 70 pkt)
Issue year2020
Vol183
Pages1-7
Publication size in sheets0.50
Article number105021
ASJC Classification1104 Aquatic Science; 1910 Oceanography; 2308 Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
DOIDOI:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.105021
Languageen angielski
Score (nominal)70
Score sourcejournalList
ScoreMinisterial score = 70.0, 31-07-2020, ArticleFromJournal
Publication indicators WoS Citations = 0.000; Scopus Citations = 0.000; Scopus SNIP (Source Normalised Impact per Paper): 2017 = 1.103; WoS Impact Factor: 2018 = 2.595 (2) - 2018=3.043 (5)
Citation count*
Cite
busy
Share Share

Get link to the record


* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Back
Confirmation
Are you sure?