Sexual dimorphism in adult Little Stints (Calidris minuta) revealed by DNA sexing and discriminant analysis

Aleksandra Niemc , Magdalena Remisiewicz , Joel Avni , Les G. Underhill

Abstract

Background: The sex of an individual organism plays such an important role in its life cycle that researchers must know a bird’s sex to interpret key aspects of its biology. The sexes of dimorphic species can be easily distinguished, but sexing monomorphic bird species often requires expensive and time-consuming molecular methods. The Little Stint (Calidris minuta) is a numerous species, monomorphic in plumage but showing a small degree of reversed sexual size dimorphism. Females are larger than males but the ranges of their measurements overlap, making Little Stints difficult to sex in the field. Our aim was to develop reliable sexing criteria for Little Stints in different stages of primary moult during their stay on the non-breeding grounds in South Africa using DNA-sexed individuals and discriminant function analysis. Methods: We caught 348 adult Little Stints in 2008–2016 on their non-breeding grounds at Barberspan Bird Sanctuary. To molecularly identify the birds’ sex we used P2/P8 primers and DNA isolated from blood samples collected in the field. We used Storer’s dimorphism index to assess the degree of sexual size dimorphism. Then we divided our sample into two groups: before or during and after primary moult. For each group we developed two functions: one using wing length only and the other a combination of morphometric features including wing, tarsus and total head length. Then we used a stepwise procedure to check which combination of measurements best discriminated sexes. To validate our result we used a jack-knife cross-validation procedure and Cohen-kappa statistics. Results: All the morphometric features we measured were bigger in DNA-sexed females than in males. Birds with fresh primaries had on average 2.3 mm longer wings than those with worn primaries. A discriminant function using wing length (D1) correctly sexed 78.8% of individuals before moult, and a stepwise analysis showed that a combination of wing length and tarsus (D2) correctly identified the sex of 82.7% of these birds. For birds with freshly moulted primaries a function using wing length (D3) correctly classified 83.4% of the individuals, and a stepwise analysis revealed that wing and total head length (D4) classified 84.7%. Discussion: Sexual size differences in Little Stints might be linked to their phylogenetics and breeding biology. Females are bigger, which increases their fecundity; males are smaller, which increases their manoeuverability during display flights and hence their mating success. Little Stints show an extreme lack of breeding site fidelity so we did not expect a geographical cline in their biometrics. Sexing criteria available for Little Stints in the literature were developed using museum specimens, which often shrink, leading to misclassification of live birds. The sexing criteria we developed can be used for studies on Little Stints at their non-breeding grounds and on past data, but should be applied cautiously because of the overlapping ranges.
Author Aleksandra Niemc (FB / BMRF)
Aleksandra Niemc ,,
- Bird Migration Research Foundation
, Magdalena Remisiewicz (FB / BMRF)
Magdalena Remisiewicz,,
- Bird Migration Research Foundation
, Joel Avni
Joel Avni,,
-
, Les G. Underhill
Les G. Underhill,,
-
Journal seriesPeerJ, ISSN 2167-8359, (A 35 pkt)
Issue year2018
Vol6
Pages1-14
Publication size in sheets0.65
Article numbere5367
Keywords in EnglishDiscriminant analysis, Morphometrics, DNA analysis, Sexual size dimorphism, Little Stint, PCR, Calidris minuta, morphology, sex determination, Waders
ASJC Classification2700 General Medicine; 1100 General Agricultural and Biological Sciences; 1300 General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology; 2800 General Neuroscience
DOIDOI:10.7717/peerj.5367
URL https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5367
Languageen angielski
LicenseJournal (articles only); published final; Uznanie Autorstwa (CC-BY); with publication
Score (nominal)35
Score sourcejournalList
ScoreMinisterial score = 35.0, 06-02-2020, ArticleFromJournal
Publication indicators WoS Citations = 0; Scopus SNIP (Source Normalised Impact per Paper): 2016 = 0.865; WoS Impact Factor: 2018 = 2.353 (2) - 2018=2.7 (5)
Citation count*2 (2020-03-25)
Cite
Share Share

Get link to the record


* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Back
Confirmation
Are you sure?