Twardowskiego koncepcja nauk indukcyjnych (krytyczne omówienie stanowiska)

Jarosław Mrozek


In one of Kazimierz Twardowski’s articles dedicated to the methodology of science, the author makes a distinction between the a priori and a posteriori sciences. Specifying the criterion for this distinction and clearly presenting the specificity of both types of science, at the end of the article, he concludes: “a posteriori or empirical sciences are therefore rightly called inductive sciences because they are the only sciences in which induction can serve as the ultimate justification of claims ...”. This statement suggests that Twardowski considered the inductive method as the proper method of developing natural sciences, which were assumed to be empirical. In this sense he can be considered, and viewed as, the proponent of inductionism. The paper is an attempt at taking a critical stance towards the inductionistic attitude of Kazimierz Twardowski.
Author Jarosław Mrozek (FSS / IPSJ / DLPSE)
Jarosław Mrozek,,
- Division of Logic, Philosophy of Science and Epistemology
Other language title versionsTwardowski‘s concept of inductive sciences (a critical review)
Journal seriesFilo-Sofija, ISSN 1642-3267, (B 7 pkt)
Issue year2018
Publication size in sheets0.5
Keywords in EnglishKazimierz Twardowski, posteriori sciences, inductive sciences, justification
Languagepl polski
LicenseJournal (articles only); published final; Uznanie Autorstwa - Użycie Niekomercyjne (CC-BY-NC); with publication
Score (nominal)7
Score sourcejournalList
ScoreMinisterial score = 7.0, 28-01-2020, ArticleFromJournal
Citation count*
Share Share

Get link to the record

* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Are you sure?