History of budget development according to the people responsible for budget planning in Poland

Anna Siemionek , Michał Chalastra

Abstract

Budgeting is a very complex process mainly due to the fact that its implementation requires implementation of numerous, complex, and interrelated tasks. Various activities of this process are carried out by many employees from different departments (Siemionek and Chalastra 2018). The budget planning process should be regarded as a set of tasks determining the value of individual budgetary items. Activities such as creating budget tables, scheduling, or planning instructions would not be analyzed. Relationships between described tasks and people who perform them have a significant impact on budgeting system quality. They can influence important and tangible benefits. On the contrary, inappropriate solutions in this regard to those activities may lead to negative assessment of this management system. Therefore, it is worth to analyze the development of budgeting system that took place in Poland during the last 30 years. The aim of this article is to identify the disadvantages and advantages of different variants of the people’s relationships and conducted tasks during budget planning. This would allow to assess them and select the most recommended standards.
Author Anna Siemionek (FM / DCF)
Anna Siemionek,,
- Department of Corporate Finance
, Michał Chalastra (FM / DA / MAU)
Michał Chalastra,,
- Management Accounting Unit
Pages341-349
Publication size in sheets0.5
Book Procházka David (eds.): Global versus local perspectives on finance and accounting: 19th Annual Conference on Finance and Accounting (ACFA 2018), Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, 2019, Springer International Publishing, ISBN 978-3-030-11850-1, [978-3-030-11851-8], 405 p., DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-11851-8
Keywords in Englishcontrolling, planning and budgeting, process implementation
DOIDOI:10.1007/978-3-030-11851-8_32
URL https://rd.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-030-11851-8_32.pdf
Languageen angielski
Score (nominal)20
ScoreMinisterial score = 20.0, 30-09-2019, ChapterFromConference
Citation count*
Cite
Share Share

Get link to the record


* presented citation count is obtained through Internet information analysis and it is close to the number calculated by the Publish or Perish system.
Back